back| <<Child Welfare Manual>>
<< Chapter 4 >> | <<Previous>> | <<Next>>

4.5.3  Judicial Review

The Regional Director or designee may receive notification that an alleged perpetrator has appealed the agency's decision to the circuit court. A Judicial Review may only occur following a CANRB review.

If the alleged perpetrator is aggrieved by the decision of the CANRB, the alleged perpetrator may seek de novo judicial review within sixty (60) days from receiving the CANRB decision from the following: 

The term "de novo" means "anew", therefore in a Judicial Review, the facts and evidence of the case must be heard and judged as if it were a brand new case.  The circuit court shall provide the alleged perpetrator the opportunity to appear and present testimony. The alleged perpetrator may subpoena any witnesses except the alleged victim or the reporter. However, the circuit court shall have the discretion to allow the parties to submit the case upon a stipulated record.

Related Subject: 210.152 RSMo.

4.5.3.1   Judicial Review Results/Subsequent Actions

It is imperative that FACES is updated for all "court adjudicated" immediately, upon notification of the Court.  Local procedures should be developed so that CD staff work closely with the courts to monitor cases, including Judicial Reviews, Juvenile Court cases as well as Criminal cases for court adjudication. 

Related Subject:  Section 2, Chapter 4.1.8.1   Court Adjudicated

Judicial Review Upholds POE

If the agency decision regarding a specific CA/N incident is sustained (substantiated) in writing by the Circuit Court:

  • Update the FACES Conclusion, Participant Characteristic and Appeals Screens from "Preponderance of Evidence" to "Court Adjudicated"; and
  • Enter a summary in the case record upon receipt of the court order.

Judicial Review Reverses POE

If the agency's decision is reversed, the following should be completed within (10) ten working days:

The Regional Director/designee shall review the case and determine whether or not the agency should contest the finding of the court. 

If the Division accepts the reversal:

NOTE:  If a Family-Centered Services record or alternative care record was opened as a result of this incident, the case record should be reviewed and any reference to a "Preponderance of Evidence" finding should be deleted.

Chapter Memoranda History: (prior to 1/31/07)

CS03-46, CS03-51, CD04-69, CD04-79, CD04-89, CD05-35, CD05-40, CD05-50, CD05-51, CD05-68,CD05-72, CD06-09, CD06-15, CD06-34, CD06-67, CD06-78

Memoranda History:

CD07-25, CD08-22