back| <<Child Welfare Manual>>
<< Section 7 >> |<<Previous>>| <<Next>>

29:  Sexual Maltreatment

  1. Definition of:
    • Sexual Maltreatment-  (As reportable under the Child Abuse/Neglect Law.)  The use, persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of any child under the age of 18, to engage in, or having a child assist any other person to engage in, any sexually explicit conduct by those responsible for the child's care, custody and control.
    • Sexual Exploitation-  (As reportable under the Child Abuse/Neglect Law.)  The sexual use of a child under the age of 18 by those responsible for his/her care, custody and control for the purpose of the individual's personal satisfaction and/or gain.  Including, but not necessarily limited to, pornography and prostitution.
  2. Indicators/Characteristics of Sexual Maltreatment:
  3. The indicators of child abuse and neglect vary.  No child or caretaker will exhibit all of the physical or behavioral indicators listed and some of the indicators are contradictory.  The behavior of an abused or neglected child and other family members may be sporadic and unpredictable. Indicators should be used only as a general guide.  The presence of indicators alone does not establish that sexual abuse or exploitation has occurred.  The presence of multiple indicators or the pervasiveness of any one behavioral indicator warrants close scrutiny by the worker.

    Physical Indicators in Child:

    It should be noted that physical indicators are present in only a very small percentage of sexual abuse cases. Therefore, the absence of physical indicators should not be considered conclusive evidence that the allegations are unsubstantiated.

    Behavioral Indicators in Child:

    Familial/Parental Characteristics:

    Pedophile Characteristics:

    The Fixated Pedophile:

    The Adolescent (Age 12-17) Offender - Characteristics:

    NOTE:  The adolescent offender must have care, custody and control of the alleged victim to be considered a perpetrator of abuse/neglect as defined in RSMo 210.

  4. Types of Evidence:

    Evidence is collected by law enforcement personnel, Children’s Division (CD) and multi-disciplinary team members and used as both physical and credible verbal evidence to document the worker's investigative conclusion.  Evidence for reports of sexual maltreatment may include any one or all of the following:

    • Doctor's statement;
    • Rape kit evidence;
    • Clothing;
    • Linens;
    • Police report;
    • Pornographic pictures;
    • Pornographic videotapes;
    • Diagnostic videotapes;
    • The child said it happened;
    • Witness' statement; and/or
    • Perpetrator's statement.
  5. Chapter 210 requires the investigator to conduct a thorough investigation.  To that end, investigators are allowed to contact anyone with information relevant to the CA/N report without the knowledge and/or consent of the subjects.  This includes interviewing the child without the knowledge and/or consent of the parent.  When the child is seen without parental consent, every effort should be made to involve the parents as quickly as possible.

    Visible Signs

    Visible signs are those observations made by the worker during the course of the investigation.  Visible signs include, but are not limited to: the size, shape and location of an injury, behavioral indicators of family members, and physical condition of the family home.

  6. Operational Definitions:

    Preponderance of Evidence:  A finding that sexual maltreatment has occurred or is occurring based on observation of visible signs, physical evidence, and/or credible verbal evidence provided to the investigator by the child, perpetrator or witnesses in accordance with the definition of sexual abuse and which is supported to a degree of evidence that is of greater weight or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it or evidence which as a whole shows the fact to be proved to be more probable than not.

    Related Subject: Section 2, Chapter 4, Attachment L  Preponderance of Evidence

    Unsubstantiated - Preventive Services Indicated:  A finding of Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services indicated is appropriate when insufficient visible signs, physical and/or credible verbal evidence exist, but where the investigator determines that indicators are present which if unresolved, could potentially contribute to child abuse/neglect.

    Unsubstantiated:  A finding of unsubstantiated is appropriate where insufficient visible signs, physical and/or credible verbal evidence exists and where few or no indicators are identified and the worker has not identified a specific threat exists for the child.

    Investigative Conclusion:  This is determined after collecting and reviewing all evidence and/or indicators obtained during the course of the investigation.  If there is by a preponderance of evidence that child abuse or neglect exists the investigative conclusion will be "Preponderance of Evidence".  If the evidence is inconclusive, but there are sufficient indicators to suggest a potential for abuse/neglect to a child, the investigative conclusion will be "Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services indicated."  Lacking evidence and sufficient indicators, the investigative conclusion will be unsubstantiated."

    Priority Status:  This is to be determined based on the degree of risk to the child and the immediacy of the treatment needs.  In a large part, this is based on the investigators judgment and knowledge of the family situation.

    Investigative Recording:  Shall be completed in a summarized narrative style on the CPS-1.  It should be written in a clear, concise, easily understood manner and include but is not limited to the following components:

    • A chronological listing of who, when, where each subject and/or collateral was contacted and the content of the interviews;
    • A brief description of all credible verbal and/or physical evidence provided to the worker during the investigation; and
    • A statement justifying the investigators investigative conclusion i.e., reason to suspect, Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services indicated or Unsubstantiated.
  7. Interviewing Victims of Sexual Abuse

    As in all types of abuse and neglect, interviewing children who have been sexually abused involves professional skill, judgment, and expertise.  The nature of the allegations, the impact on the child and family, and the physical and behavioral indicators are such that creative and effective interviewing techniques are needed.

  8. The following is meant to serve as a guideline in providing questions that may be asked of children.  These questions are phrased in such a way that they will help elicit the needed information in a non-threatening way.  When appropriate, the information gathered can be used in a juvenile and/or criminal court proceeding.  This information is not a substitute for worker's judgment and creativity as each child will need to be assessed based on the interviewing technique that is most appropriate (depending on such factors as age, personality, verbal skills, etc.).  Props, i.e., anatomically correct dolls, puppets or drawings may be used to elicit information from the young or non-verbal child.

    Arrange a Safe Setting for Interview:  Careful consideration should be given to the choice of setting for this interview. If at all possible, children should be seen away from the alleged perpetrator and in an environment the child would consider "safe," and familiar to the child--i.e., school or child care center.  Whether or not to include a parent during this interview will depend on such factors as the relationship of the alleged perpetrator to the family and where the report originated.  It is important to remember that sexual abuse is a private, secret affair and there may be many reasons a child would hesitate to reveal information.

    Establish Rapport:  Give your name and simple definition of what you do; i.e., someone who helps children when there are problems; I get calls sometimes when someone is concerned about a child -- I got a call about you:

    Things to Avoid:

    Time is a Relative Factor:  Most people measure time in relation to other factors in their lives.  Children are particularly tuned to this both in long-term and short-term time frames.  It is frequently helpful to use such factors in assisting the child in establishing a time frame; i.e., long term -- was it hot or cold outside, during the school year, around Christmas or other specific holidays; close to some specific occurrence -- trip to grandma's; when a friend spent the night, etc. (such things should be verifiable with some checking); short-term -- in the morning after Mom leaves for work, while Dad goes bowling, during a specific TV program.

    Workers should take into account that a child's concept of time is not literal in terms of minutes or hours.  The child's perception of the length of time an incident lasts may be skewed by emotions, etc.  A child's description of an unrealistic time frame does not necessarily mean he's lying.

    Description of a Specific Incident:  Has someone done something to you which you didn't like or which made you feel uncomfortable?  What happened?  Who?  Where and when? Children may vary greatly on which of these things is easiest to reveal first.  If such a broad question reveals information of other kinds of "uncomfortable" occurrence, you may need to be more specific, i.e., I understand that someone touched your private parts -- (establish what private parts are).  It will be important to establish information as specific as possible regarding what happened.

    After the child has told you what happened in his own words, you may need to ask some specific questions.  Some questions that may help (depending on age, emotional state, maturity, communication skills) might include:

    How Do You Tell if a Child is not Telling the Truth?

    Children (pre-adolescent) "lie" for two reasons:

    1. To get out of trouble; and,
    2. To prevent trouble.

    Given this information, the interviewer should also be aware of the following points of information:

    Questions to Ask the Child to Assess Risk to Child:

    End Interview:  Ideally, this interview will take place in cooperation with the appropriate law enforcement personnel. However, there may be occasions when worker will conduct the interview alone.  In such cases, the child needs to be prepared for the fact that he/she may need to give this information to someone else.

    In any case, try to tell the child things that might happen. This will differ according to local policy, but may need to include such things as role of the police (may come to school in uniform -- child is not in trouble); possibility of foster care placement (include a little of what foster homes or shelters are like); possibility of criminal action -- (adult has done something against the law -- judge will decide what should happen).

    Questions regarding what is going to happen next must be handled honestly, but to the extent possible, in a way that relieves the child of responsibility for any action that takes place.

    Results of this interview should be closely documented in the case record.

Chapter Memoranda History: (prior to 1/31/07)

CD04-79, CD05-35,

Memoranda History: